The bar codes first known use was in 1963, and often represents binary information which would be scanned optically as part of a computer system. However, for me, the one pictured above has a special meaning. It reminds me, that over the last one or two years, the LBGT Community has firmly become part of our mainstream society, and the support will continue to grow, and it will not be reversed. A good example is that as a Firefox user, I applauded the gay and pro-gay staff and customers who pressured the newly appointed chief executive officer (Brendan Eich) at Mozilla to resign, because he opposed gay marriage. Then think about the vast number of judges, who have recently recognized Our Community with their pro-gay verdicts or opinions. The list is getting longer and moving faster, and my mental scanner is clicking on that bar code a lot, simply because I read the following…
From our friends at GLAAD:
While Arizona was busy passing legislation to legalize discrimination, Maine was killing a similar measure. Following last week’s Senate vote in which LD 1428, “An Act to Protect Religious Freedom”, was defeated 19-16, Maine’s House of Representatives voted 89-52 today against the GOP sponsored bill.
In a Saturday night speech at the Human Rights Campaign gala in New York City, Attorney General of the United States Eric Holder announced a directive that will extend recognition to all same-gender marriages in legal dealings with the Federal government. Regardless of which state a person resides in, if they were legally married, the Federal government’s Department of Justice will treat them as a married couple, with all the rights and benefits of that marriage.
This does not legalize ‘gay marriage’ across the nation, but merely prevents the Federal government’s legal apparatus from refusing to recognize marriages in states where they are not sanctioned, but were performed legally elsewhere.
Holder will release a memo on Monday directing DOJ offices to recognize same-gender marriages “to the greatest extent possible under the law.”
At the HRC event, Holder compared the marriage equality struggle to the civil rights struggles of the ’60′s, saying “Just like during the civil rights movement of the 1960s, the stakes involved in this generation’s struggle for LGBT equality could not be higher. As attorney general, I will not let this Department be simply a bystander during this important moment in history.” Holder also said, “This means that, in every courthouse, in every proceeding, and in every place where a member of the Department of Justice stands on behalf of the United States — they will strive to ensure that same-sex marriages receive the same privileges, protections and rights as opposite-sex marriages under federal law.”
The HRC released this statement:
“This landmark announcement will change the lives of countless committed gay and lesbian couples for the better. While the immediate effect of these policy decisions is that all married gay couples will be treated equally under the law, the long-term effects are more profound. Today, our nation moves closer toward its ideals of equality and fairness for all. Attorney General Holder continues to show incredible leadership, and this latest action cements his place in history alongside Robert F. Kennedy, another Attorney General who crusaded for civil rights.”
The expected naysayers from the right were trotted out by many of the “mainstream media” to offer “balance”, and commentary against the DOJ action, but here at QueerLandia, we’re not going to give them the space to rant. If you want to find out what they said, try your favorite search engine.
It will be interesting to see if this spreads to other Federal agencies. For example, immigration is under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Will gay and lesbian citizens be able to marry someone of the same gender, and sponsor them for citizenship? Will NASA ever have (or announce, at least) that a gay or lesbian astronaut couple will go into space? The speculations are endless.
From now on, the DOJ will treat you as married, even if your state won’t. As we’ve said before, marriage equality is inevitable, and those who stand against it are on the wrong side of history.
Well, at least they’re honest about it.
The New York Times reports that the state of Utah, in court documents defending it’s constitutional ban on same-gender marriage, dismisses the positions of premier medical groups when it comes to gay rights.
Basically, what they’ve said is that if the general public thinks the legislature is right in their “facts”, i.e. that same-gender marriages are bad for kids, then it doesn’t matter if the relevant medical associations and published literature disagree. Utah claims the right to enact laws in opposition to settled science.
Utah, here’s a hint: That’s the wrong basket into which to place all your eggs. Or even only some.
The Supreme Court of the United States issued a hold on the Utah Federal Court ruling that had tossed out the state’s ban on gay marriage. This will allow Utah to cease issuing marriage licenses to same-gender couples as the appeals process works it’s way through the lower courts.
The full court voted Friday on Utah’s request, only hours after receiving the final written documents. Justice Sonia Sotomayor forwarded the request to the full court, rather than issue a ruling on her own as the Justice responsible for emergency requests from the 10th Circuit.
Chris Kluwe writes about being let go from the Minnesota Vikings, and how homophobia and bigotry appear to be the only rational reasons why. No longer content to allow those who are responsible to hide behind corporate media shields, Kluwe explains what happened to him for supporting marriage equality.